UK Drill Artist Rhys Herbert, Known as Digga D, Imprisoned for Cannabis Trafficking

• by Arlen Fitzpatrick
• 0 Comments

The Rise and Downfall of Digga D

Rhys Herbert, the UK drill music sensation better known by his stage name Digga D, has been a formidable presence in the music industry, particularly within the drill music scene known for its raw and gritty narratives. Yet, a shadow has been cast over his career with his recent sentencing for supplying cannabis, bringing to light a saga that intertwines the vibrancy of the music industry with the stark realities of legal transgressions. On January 31, 2025, at Lincoln Crown Court, Herbert stood before the judge as the court verdict sealed his fate: three years and 11 months in prison. This notable ruling came after a tense two-day trial in December, during which it was determined that Herbert had been a significant player in the distribution of cannabis.

The court proceedings revealed a sophisticated operation overseen by Digga D, involving the possession and sale of substantial quantities of cannabis. It was established that he had been in possession of a staggering 50.65 kilograms of the drug, managing to sell at least 45 kilograms for a commercial profit during the period from January to July 2023. These activities underscored the scale of his involvement and the seriousness of the charges he faced. Despite his role in exporting cannabis to a wide market, his defense maintained an alternative narrative.

The Legal Battle and Sentencing

During the court's deliberations, Judge Simon Hirst noted the gravity of Herbert's offenses, highlighting that involvement in such illicit activities comes with inevitable consequences. Rhys Herbert's encounters with the legal system were not new. With a criminal record stretching back to his younger years—marked by six prior convictions for a total of 13 offenses, including violent disorder and possession of a blade—his pattern of behavior was considered by the court in conjunction with his current charges. Herbert's familiarity with cannabis dated back to his early adolescence, when he began using it, according to defense claims.

Attorney James Scobie KC, representing Digga D, painted a picture of a young artist caught in a turbulent storm, a solo figure unfazed by collective criminal networks but struggling with the trappings of his past. Scobie highlighted Herbert's singular operation, arguing that his client posed no direct danger to the public and emphasizing the personal misfortune of lost professional opportunities behind bars. Despite these arguments, Detective Constable Jacob Saville presented unyielding evidence of Herbert's culpability, marking a line that the defense could not cross. Saville's testimony emphasized the widespread impact that drug-related crimes have on communities, underscoring the imperative to address such activities sternly.

The Cultural Context and Impact

Digga D's trial and conviction have sparked a broader conversation about the intersection of fame, crime, and responsibility, especially for young artists navigating the complexities of the music industry. The drill music scene, renowned for its vibrant yet often controversial lyrics, has been a fertile ground for several young talents, Digga D included. However, the pressures of fame, coupled with the temptation of lucrative yet illicit opportunities, pose significant risks. The case highlights a recurring theme: the challenge of overcoming personal demons while in the public eye, a narrative familiar to many emerging artists.

Within the framework of his career, Herbert's story is both a cautionary tale and a reflection of the dual-edged sword of fame—where success and notoriety can lead to both ascension and downfall. As his music captivated audiences, his legal missteps culminated in a sobering reality check. This intersection of cultural influence and legal repercussions serves to remind the industry of the fragile line artists often tread.

A Community's Response

Reactions from within the drill music community and beyond have been mixed, with some rallying in support of the artist, citing the need for intervention and support rather than strict punishment. Meanwhile, others emphasize the importance of accountability, particularly when influential figures impact their followers' perceptions. Digga D's situation raises crucial questions about the role of mentorship, guidance, and second chances for young talents facing similar crossroads in life.

While his sentencing marks a significant chapter in Herbert's life and career, it also prompts reflection on the broader societal challenges related to drug distribution and its ripple effects. As communities grapple with these issues, the focus shifts to preventative measures, offering support and alternative paths for those at risk of transitioning from promising artists to cautionary tales. Digga D's experience serves as both a spotlight on individual struggles and a call to action for systemic change.